Page 1 of 1

Ageless Linux

Posted: Thu Mar 19, 2026 6:41 pm
by Zema Bus
AgelessLinux.jpg
From agelesslinux.org

But the interesting part isn’t the base. It’s the reason this distro exists.

It was created as a symbol of resistance.

That’s also not new in the Linux world. Many distros have been born out of disagreement or protest. For example, Void Linux emerged during the heated systemd controversy, offering a system that avoided systemd entirely.

The new distro, called Ageless Linux, follows a similar idea. It’s essentially Debian Linux but without age verification.
Age verification… what?

A new trend is quietly spreading across the United States: laws that require age verification at the operating system level.

It started with California, and states like Colorado, New York, and Illinois have proposed similar legislation. Reports also suggest that Brazil may be moving in the same direction.

What makes this development even more interesting is that Meta, the company behind Facebook, reportedly lobbied heavily for these laws.

Until now, governments mainly pressured social media platforms to verify users’ ages to prevent young children and teenagers from accessing certain services.

Meta’s proposal shifts that responsibility. Instead of every app or website verifying a user’s age individually, the operating system would verify it once.

Then, through an API exposed by the OS or its app store, applications could simply ask the system for the user’s age or age category.

In other words, your operating system becomes the age gatekeeper for every app you install.

And that idea has sparked a lot of debate in the tech community especially among Linux and open-source developers.
From itsfoss.com

Re: Ageless Linux

Posted: Thu Mar 19, 2026 8:20 pm
by Grogan
The first distro that vows to be without the "age verification" baked in. It will be something that users can disable anyway on open source stacks, though.

That won't be a law that anybody can enforce. It will be easily defeated at the OS level and/or won't be effective, because parents and kids are going to lie. Hell, when my niece and nephew were 10 years old, they were 19 and 20 on gmail and social media etc. It would have made them more vulnerable to list their real ages! We let them go wherever they wanted (unsupervised, with their own computers and devices) and do whatever they wanted. Neither of them ever had any problem on the Internet. They never even got malware.

Typical of Meta though, shifting responsibility to make things onerous for others. I hate that Zuckerfuckercocksucker (and his ilk) almost as much as I hate Donald Trump. Entire platforms (software, social and political) built on lies.